Society Promoting Environmental Conversation logo

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   Next >  Last >> 
  • 20 Nov 2018 12:21 PM | Anonymous

    Members' Corner is a monthly blog series where SPEC members share their favourite sustainability-related resources.

    You should watch: Can Sustainable Plastics Save Us?  featuring Dr. Love-Ese Chile – Webcast 

    Daniel Rotman, Co-Chair - Waste Committee & SPEC Board Member

    There is a lot of mis- and incorrect information on bioplastics and plastics in general, and this webcast helps clarify the issue. In this talk Dr. Love-Ese Chile explores the major types of sustainable plastics available and highlights what we can do as consumers and tax-payers to help create a circular economy for these new materials. You should watch this webcast if you are interested in learning about sustainable plastics and circular economies from a PhD in bio-plastics. I also know her personally and she is dedicated to this problem.



    You should listen to: Mothers of Invention – Podcast

    Alison Krahn, SPEC Board Member, Energy Committee 

    Hosted by Mary Robinson (former president of Ireland) and Maeve Higgins (Irish comedian), the Mothers of Invention podcast celebrates women who do remarkable things in pursuit of climate justice. Each episode explores a diverse array of women from around the world who are at the forefront of the fight against climate change and injustice - there is a seriously impressive range of guests, from local politicians to presidents and cabinet ministers, local activists to global campaigners, entrepreneurs to world-renowned scientists. Climate change is a huge, complex issue which can be overwhelming, but the Mothers of Invention podcast strikes a good balance between education and entertainment to raise awareness about climate justice. This show is engaging, funny, educational, and the many stories of the "mothers" are truly inspiring.


    You should check out: Food Tank – Web Resource and Global Organization

    Tara Moreau, SPEC Board Member and Food Committee

    Food Tank is a global organization that is working to advance food systems. Their website is a great resource for info on sustainable agriculture and how it relates to other issues such as climate change and poverty. They also release top 10 lists of food-related books. 

  • 17 Nov 2018 10:21 AM | Anonymous

    By Dr. Carole Christopher, SPEC President

    We’re told that sharing our intentions with friends may influence their decision about whether to vote and how to vote in the referendum on Proportional Representation.  With that in mind, and knowing that good hearted people can disagree, I’d like to ask you to vote for Proportional Representation.  

    The easy question is Question #1 – choosing between Proportional Representation (PR) or First Past the Post (FPTP.)  PR distributes seats in the legislature according to the proportion of the popular vote and FPTP is the familiar “winner takes all” system of voting.  My friend Bob Bossin says the choice is proportional representation or disproportional Representation.  That sums up my perspective as well.

    Question #2 is the harder question that asks you to rank the three options for how to implement PR.  It’s important to understand that you can skip the second question.  Some people are not participating because they find the options hard to differentiate and make a choice. Don’t skip the opportunity to vote for Proportional Representation.  

    Perhaps there is no single good answer to the question of which option is best.  The easy answer is, “they’re all ice cream, just different flavours,” meaning they’re all 'better' (more fair) than FPTP and they all have the same basic intention and some similarities.  But there are differences, and, because they’re unfamiliar, they're not that easy to explain.  


    We need a system that allows voters to bring their values and not just their strategic concerns into the voting booth.  We need a system that forces parties to bring their best ideas into coalitions that balance views and focus on good governance. 


    Another friend, Patricia Lane, devised a metaphor that helped me reflect on the options.  Here is my tweaked version:

    Imagine you’re going to buy a car.  What kind of car do you want?  If you want an older, used model that's familiar but a gas hog, First Past the Post is your choice.  If you want a more modern, sustainable, and neighbourhood friendly model, Proportional Representation is your choice.  Obviously my bias is showing but you knew that already.

    Assuming you choose Proportional Representation as the voting system, do you want: 

    a) A model that’s theoretically very good but not as widely used and is still being tested?  That’s Duel Member Proportional (DMP - Option #1)

    b) A model that’s widely used and accepted and has proven qualities?  That’s Mixed Member Proportional (MMP – Option #2)

    c) A model that’s adaptable to the terrain of rural areas but also economical and flexible for city driving?  That’s Rural Urban Proportional (URP – Option #3)

    You can get a lot more detail about each of these through the voters’ guide you got in the mail and online at Elections BC, but the details may be less important than a general sense that they are all aiming at the same outcome – proportional distribution of seats according to the proportion of votes. 

    There’s an on-line survey that matches your values with the different systems, including the choice between PR and FPTP. I took it an at the end it matched my voting choices exactly so I recommend it. Here’s the link for that survey.

    Arguments Against

    The major arguments launched against Proportional Representation are:

    1. Party bosses will choose the candidates. Well, actually, isn’t that pretty much want happens now under FPTP where candidates are vetted by parties?  That’s not a bad thing and parties will continue to vet candidates under proportional systems. Independents are still independent.


    2. The door will be open to a government take-over by extreme parties.  CCPA research shows that, “Historically speaking, whenever we have seen the emergence of far right and neo-Nazi parties, it is clear they are a product not of the electoral system but of neoliberal policies and austerity.”  Consider the Trump administration in the US, the Ford Administration in Ontario, the Duarte administration in The Philippines, or the previous Thatcher administration in the UK, or the Harper administration in Canada.  All have/had an extreme neoliberal agenda and all are FPTP systems. 


    3. It’s too confusing.  Essentially this is an argument to play it safe and avoid uncertainty.  Yet, the most compelling fact I heard in the very unedifying debate between the leaders was that, in all the Provincial elections we’ve had, only one has produced a majority government with a majority of votes. Wow!! The rest are false majorities giving 100% of the power to parties that typically have 35-40% of the vote.  That's the clear unfairness of FPTP.


    Remember, the proposal for PR allows us to road-test it for two election cycles before there's another referendum to re-decide.  That's meant to reassure hesitant voters that there is an "escape clause."  No system is completely fail-safe but PR addresses the worst grievance of FPTP, the 'false majorities' that entrench political parties that; a) depend on splitting the opposition as their means of maintaining power, and b) use their non-majority power to promote only their own view of how the world should operate.  We need a system that allows voters to bring their values and not just their strategic concerns into the voting booth.  We need a system that forces parties to bring their best ideas into coalitions that balance views and focus on good governance.  

    Thank you for reading this.  I hope it's been useful.

  • 08 Nov 2018 1:50 PM | Anonymous

    By Ali Dawson

    Living in the city, it’s not every day that you get a chance to connect with nature. Spending too much time living in the concrete jungle can have an adverse effect on your health. It’s important to spend some time around nature every once in a while. That doesn’t necessarily mean that you need to pack up and go camping in the mountains once a month. You can encourage wildlife to flourish right in your backyard. Not only will this give you your own little slice of paradise, but also help to sustain crucial animal populations that are having trouble adapting to urban landscapes. Here’s how you can encourage the birds and the bees to frequent your garden and give them everything that they need to thrive.


    Insects and Pollinators

    Pollinators such as bees and butterflies are crucial to our fragile ecosystem. Many plant species rely on the movement of these pollinators to fertilize flowers, including plants that we farm. Without pollinators, the world is likely to face a global food crisis, but unfortunately, their numbers seem to be falling. You can help pollinator populations to resurge by providing them with flowers that are free of toxic herbicides and pesticides. Even if you don’t have garden space, hanging a flower box outside your window will attract pollinators and spruce up your living space. In order to conserve water, it’s a good idea to irrigate flowers using a drip system.

    Our Flying Friends

    Birds are also an important part of the ecosystem. Not only do they help pollinators to fertilize flowers, but they also play a critical role in insect population control. Birds eat many of the pests that invade our homes, eat our food, and decimate our crops. You can encourage bird populations to frequent the city by leaving out a source of food, such as nuts or seeds, and water. Just remember not to go overboard with the water, as much of it will be lost to evaporation. Either limit the amount of water you leave out each day or conserve it by installing a drip system for the birds instead.

    Encouraging wildlife to thrive in your backyard is not only good for your psyche but also your environment. Going green in a literal sense can help to maintain and even restore dwindling animal populations in urban areas. Insects and birds, in particular, are vital to the wellbeing of our environment and our ecosystem.

  • 02 Nov 2018 2:14 PM | Anonymous

    By: Steve Fetterly, P.Eng., SPEC Energy and Transportation Committee

    On a Saturday in mid-September, BC Sustainable Energy Association (BCSEA) hosted an annual event with this year’s theme focused on BC’s transition to clean transportation (learn more here). A number of representatives from the public, private and non-profit sectors excitedly came together to share past lessons learned and glimpses into the future with up-and-coming industry technology to support the all-important “greening” of the transportation sector. As a result, the day was full of meaningful conversation, sprouting ideas in pursuit of solutions while leaving an uplifting, optimistic and motivating outlook on how industry is shifting.

    This seminar/conference/networking event gathered like-minded speakers, listeners and general participants all eager to learn and discuss ways to support the transition to clean transportation. Bowinn Ma (MLA North Vancouver-Lonsdale & Parliamentary Secretary for TransLink) opened the day by emphasizing how access to major transit corridors from urban developments and affordable housing will continue to provide all residents with smart and sustainable transportation options. From there, the event was broken out into four panels: (i) transportation and land use planning; (ii) barriers to wide-spread electric vehicle adoption; (iii) the future of freight; and (iv) taking pilot projects to becoming industry drivers.

    1. Transportation and Land Use Planning

    This panel was meant to illustrate how municipal planners & policy makers are working with mass transit to reduce emissions. Derrick Cheung (TransLink) highlighted the need to accommodate ridership growth on public transit as 82% of new homes built in Greater Vancouver are in walking distance of transit. Tim Barton (Senior Citywide & Transit Planning Engineer, City of Vancouver) illustrated how integrated city planning can address the challenges resulting from an increasing population while maintaining alignment with city rejections of major roadway upgrades for motor vehicles. As of 2016, 50% of transportation load share was attributed to green options such as cycling, walking and transit. David Oliver (Greenlines Technology) discussed the problems resulting from impediments to implementing innovative transit solutions such as the lack of data sharing in North America due to safeguarding of propriety information across the industry, unlike Finland where open data sharing is now a requirement. David inferred that most people are not aware of all their transportation options since commonly used trip planning Apps default to private car mode without the ability to easily combine different transportation modes.

    2. Beyond Barriers to Charging

    The second panel dealt with electric load management to allow for 100% electric vehicle (EV) ready neighbourhoods and seamless mobility. Anaissa Franca (Canadian Urban Transit Research & Innovation Consortium) explained the issues surrounding the scalability of electric mass transit as limited by infrastructure while pointing out that utilization of hydrogen fuel cells may help alleviate this problem. Neil MacEachern (Environmental Coordinator, City of Port Coquitlam) outlined how cities are requiring that new residential construction easily allow for future EV charger installation for each dwelling unit. Neil also discussed 2 major barriers to EVs and potential solutions: (i) the BC Strata Property Act makes it difficult to install EV chargers in stratified residential buildings. Therefore a “right-to-charge” provision was proposed to be included in the Strata Property Act, however the proposal was denied but an amendment was agreed upon that stratas must accommodate reasonable requests from residents for the purpose of EV charging; and (ii) the BC Utilities Commission Act only allows registered ‘public utility’ companies to sell energy. Although stratas are specifically excluded in this definition, a proposal has been submitted to exempt the reselling of electricity for specific purposes from this definition (see resolutions and responses at https://www.ubcm.ca/EN/main/resolutions/resolutions/resolutions-responses.html).

    3. The Future of Freight

    In this panel, we explored multi-modal technologies to help reduce carbon emissions resulting from the transportation of container goods via road, rail and waterways. Allan Grant (Corvus Energy) presented on exciting marine battery technology for all-electric and hybrid freight vessels. Ports across the world are starting to enact laws requiring that incoming vessels incorporate electric and/or hybrid technology in order to use the port. Allan indicated that the Port of Vancouver is responsible for 80% of the City of Vancouver’s GHG emissions from transportation. Mike Bains (FortisBC) explained FortisBC’s targets to provide 5% of natural gas supply as renewable natural gas (RNG), typically from biomass. Costs of RNG are still quite high compared to conventional natural gas but new technologies are working to close the gap.

    4. From Pilots to Industry Drivers

    The final panel highlighted current pilots involving smart vehicles and electric buses for low carbon transportation. Kelly Carmichael (BCIT) gave an overview of their pilot project in New Westminster to use street light electrical supplies to power curb-side EV chargers. By changing street lights from conventional high intensity discharge bulbs to LEDs, enough capacity can be re-purposed from the existing infrastructure to supply EV chargers. Eve Hou (Translink) illustrated the concept of “Mobility as a Service” and how companies in Europe are providing trip bundling services to demonstrate all mobility options and their combinations. Kristina Mlakar (Canadian Urban Transit Research & Innovation Consortium) showed a snapshot of CUTRIC’s innovative approach regarding the future of autonomous and electric mass transit, as well as existing projects to implement all-electric off-grid transit buses.

    The passion for serious change was in abundance throughout the day as interactive presentations and enthusiastic conversation linked people from government, industry and non-profits. I know I felt as if my head would explode from all the interesting information but was left feeling invigorated with so many positive stories leading the way to minimize the harmful impacts of conventional transportation on the environment. I have no doubt that the event truly made critical connections to spark new collaboration in unmeasurable ways and continue the relentless pursuit of a transition to clean transportation.

  • 09 Oct 2018 3:15 PM | Anonymous

    Members' Corner is a monthly blog series where SPEC members share their favourite sustainability-related resources.


    You should read: the article “The Future of Cities” by Taras Grescoe

    Art Bomke, SPEC Board of Director and Food & Environment Committee Co-Chair

    I think this is especially relevant in Metro Vancouver as we approach the October 20th municipal elections and face ballots with a multitude of candidates. Most are seeking to make changes some of which could reverse the progress made to facilitate the ability of citizens to reduce their dependence on the automobile. One new party, Coalition Vancouver, is seeking to wedge their way into power with threats to tear up bike paths and create policy that favours cars. This Walrus article makes the case for a city that “prioritizes active transport, transit and intelligently planned density.” Let’s make candidates clearly indicate their stand on transportation and hold them accountable upon election.

    You should know about: Bâtiment 7 in Pointe-Saint-Charles - Montréal

    Betzy Salas, from SPEC's Energy Committee

    It is an old abandoned railway building, which after 10 years of litigation was donated to the community to be a factory of collective autonomy. After 10 months of work this building was restored using mostly recycled materials or manufacturing faults. This building uses renewable energies for the production of energy. Hydronic heating system with a source of natural gas energy, also the use of Geothermal and Biomass.

    You should read: “Climate Change Needs Behavior Change”, a report by Rare

    Robin Hadac, SPEC Communications Coordinator

    There has been a lot of sobering news on climate change recently, which has a lot of people searching for answers. If you are like me and looking for immediate action you can take, I highly recommend reading RARE’s comprehensive report on the impact individual behavioural can have on climate mitigation. They came up with 30 behaviour changes that you can do as an individual, clustered by category, and ranked in terms of plausible-optimum scenario emissions reductions. Number one? – Reducing food waste, which they found could be equivalent to reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 70.5-93.7 gigatons!

    If you read the report and feel inspired to take action, SPEC’s Waste Committee will be using this report to guide their upcoming projects. Drop by the next meeting to get more involved.

    You should use: Ecosia

    Magali Vander Vorst, SPEC Board member

    There’s nothing better than the feeling of saving the environment without even lifting a finger. Or saving it by just lifting one. Using the search engine Ecosia.org you are planting trees every time you hit Search. Instead of using good ol’ Google you simply use this site and scan still find that brunch restaurant menu, check the weather forecast or find answers to any other questions you normally ask the G giant. At a rate of 45 searches per tree, this German-based foundation has already planted over 35 million trees since 2009 – and I take ownership for at least ten of those, so far. Another added bonus is that they don’t sell your data to advertisers, unlike most search engines, so not only are you making the world greener but also safer for you.

  • 02 Oct 2018 12:12 PM | Anonymous

    By Dr. Carole Christopher, SPEC President

    Ballots will arrive in October for the referendum on Proportional Representation (PR.) It’s an opportunity to express your point of view on whether to change our electoral system from first-past-the-post (FPTP) to proportional representation (PR).  

    Both Systems have their proponents and their critics. Under FPTP, “the winner takes all,” irrespective of the percentage of the popular vote.  In a PR system, votes are distributed according to how people actually vote. FPTP has the advantage of familiarity. PR has the advantage of fairer distribution of actual votes.  

    SPEC favors PR because it allows people to 'vote their values' and it promotes parties working together.  However the purpose of this writing is not to convince you, but to explain the process.  

    The referendum ballot has two parts:

    Part 1 - asks you to choose between First-Past-The-Post and Proportional Representation.

    Part 2 - ask you to choose among three options for how to make the necessary changes if the majority vote in favor of PR. All three lead to the same outcome- a transition from FPTP to PR.  No one is definitively superior to the others. They are unfamiliar to us but they are all drawn from the experiences of countries around the world who use PR.  And they are crafted to reflect conditions in British Columbia, particularly to balance the very different sizes of populations and electoral ridings in urban and rural areas.  All three options facilitate a transition from FPTP to PR.  

    Some people may decide not to vote because they can’t decide which of the three options they favor. That would be a mistake.  You can skip Part 2 and your ballot is still valid.

    A couple of other things to consider in voting:

    1.  The rules around all voting procedures in BC, (FPTP or PR), are closely supervised by Elections BC, an independent and non-partisan office of the legislature that set standards and monitors the rules around every provincial election.

    2. Helen Clark, the Ex-PM of New Zealand (which has a PR system) was asked at a Vancouver seminar this summer whether PR systems are vulnerable to parties with extreme views taking over the government?  Among several things, she said; 

    • Even if an ‘extreme’ group rises above the threshold of votes to reach party status, it is better to have them in government where they are accountable.  
    • FPTP is no protection against extreme views, as evidenced by the 2016 election in the United States.
    • Around the world, there is more evidence of extremism in FPTP than in PR systems.  

    The three options in part 2 of the referendum ballot are the most confounding for people. Here is an unbiased resource on the three options from ElectionsBC. 

    In the Next newsletter, we will take a closer look at the three options.

  • 15 Aug 2018 10:44 PM | Anonymous

    By SPEC President, Dr. Carole Christopher

    Fireworks. I found myself consciously not watching the fireworks this year. A couple of decades ago in the early years of this annual event, I went with friends to Vanier Park to see the fireworks. I was hoping to reconnect with an awesome experience in 1976 in Riverside Park, New York City, where a huge crowd watched the fireworks celebrating the US bicentennial above the Hudson River.  Those fireworks were decidedly less pyrotechnic than now but it was a profound gathering of the community with great love of country fueling a remarkable civic experience.  It left an indelible impression on me. 


    The event at Vanier Park started off well enough but within 10 minutes I could no longer see the full effects of the fireworks looking up through a great stagnant haze of smoke. It totally shifted the experience for me. The most memorable and pleasurable part of the evening was the stimulating night biking back to our W. Point Gray home. I’ve had very little appetite to rejoin the crowds in subsequent years.  Since then, I’ve occasionally enjoyed the fireworks from the distance of our front balcony where we had a clear view between the trees, but the inevitable and lingering cloud of haze over the city has produced a mild aversive reaction in me. That’s a slightly precarious thing to say about an event that attracts over a quarter of a million people at every showing. Yet this year, I feel compelled to say a couple of things about this annual event. 

    The fireworks this year took place when the whole Metro Vancouver region is in stage III drought conditions, under an air advisory alert, and under serious threat of fires. Over the years, as the summer draught and fires have worsened, I’ve wondered if we can do this much loved celebration in a way that takes account of and adds to public awareness around the seriousness of these threats? 

    I heard an interview recently with the owner of the Christine Lake Lodge, currently threatened by fires. She spoke simply and matter-of-factly of the necessity to revamp their schedule so that August is not a time in which the lodge depends on tourism for its operation. I admired her capacity to take stock of realities and revise accordingly.

    With this on my mind we went to Victoria for the August long weekend, breaking a longstanding tradition of staying home over holiday weekends. On Sunday evening we went to the inner harbour to hear the Victoria symphony and view the fireworks. I hadn’t mentioned to my partner my misgivings about fireworks and was going along with his plans for an enjoyable evening.  And, indeed, it was! I stood in a large crowd where we luckily found a place to tuck in with a perfect view and good listening range. A family of three, also from Vancouver, tucked in beside us. The fireworks came just as a gorgeous sunset gave way to dark and the orchestra stopped, giving way to a collective silence broken by appreciative gasps of visual pleasure. It lasted about ten minutes and we turned to our neighbours, all gushing agreement, “that was just the right amount of fireworks!!” The haze was just starting to form but not the murky cloud of smoke. Rick and I mused as we walked home on the felt sense of a coming together into the commons. 

    I’m not expecting an avalanche of support and indeed I may get an avalanche of disagreement that we need to do any Rethinking of our Vancouver annual fireworks event. If it’s going to continue, which is almost a certainty, is there a way to do it that is less likely to collide with the draught-air pollution-fire triad that is now a predictable feature of Vancouver summers? I think it’s worth examining.

  • 14 Aug 2018 12:59 PM | Anonymous


    An inside look on how Emily Carr Elementary completely revamped their waste system and diverted 800 pounds of recyclables from the landfill.


    Cadine (left) with the team of student volunteers that sort classroom waste and recycling.

    Emily Carr Elementary School is on a mission. Two years ago, the school took the Zero Waste Challenge to divert recyclables away from the garbage bin. Over the next 730 days, students saved approximately 800 pounds of plastic, foil composites, styrofoam, felts, and glue sticks from the landfill.

    The idea started with school and student support worker Cadine Boechler. Looking around the school, with all the preventable garbage being sent to the landfill, she saw both an opportunity and a necessity to change the current waste system.

    She built new waste sorting stations for the hallways and classrooms using recycled materials, and created signs with waste items glued on so the kids could recognize where their waste was supposed to go. Every station has separate bins for garbage, blue-bin recyclables, organics, soft plastics, and foil composites—like chip bags and granola bar wrappers. In addition to these bins, classrooms also have bins for felt pens and glue sticks.

    Cadine built this waste sorting system in the main hallway.

    Once the waste sorting systems were in place, it was time to get the students involved. In order to make sure all students were participating, Cadine recruited a team of student volunteers to go to each classroom and teach about the new system and how to correctly sort waste into the bins. Throughout the school year, as classes produce and sort their waste, every month a couple of students from each class bring their bins outside to a recycling collection area. Another team of regular student volunteers sorts through the classroom bins to make sure there is no contamination, then adds the recycling to the appropriate bins. These bins are then collected and transported by Pacific Mobile Depot once a month for $30/month.

    Two student volunteers sort classroom recycling into blue bins.

    We got the chance to visit Emily Carr Elementary and chat with Cadine, the mastermind behind this project, about the new waste system and the impact it is having on the students.

    What made you decide to do this Zero Waste Challenge?

    I decided to do this Zero Waste Challenge when I noticed that the school landfill bin was full of packaging that could be recycled. I thought that the program fit into our school’s environmental goals and connected well with our curriculum, which teaches about taking care of the environment and social responsibility. It just seemed like the right thing to do considering the state of the planet, and a great way to teach the students that it is possible to create solutions.

    How has the sorting system impacted how the students recycle and think about waste?

    The system has been really transformative for the students. When the grade 5 group went to camp they decided, without any instructions from the teachers, to save all their packaging and bring it back to the school.

    Have you received any feedback from parents?

    I have had feedback from parents about how the program has really impacted their home life in a positive way. They now save all their packaging and do drop-offs on the weekends! One of our students in grade 2 even spoke to his strata council about increasing the recycling in his building and another has implemented some zero waste practices in her guide group!

    What advice would you give to teachers hoping to start a similar program in their school?

    My advice for staff who would like to implement a similar program at their school is to have the program be student-led and run. I believe that the success of our program is due to the fact that we had peer educators teach the students workshops about the program and why we are doing it. Our students are also the ones who facilitate a monthly collection and take bins out and back at lunch and recess, so they really own the program and feel proud of what they are doing. I would also say to keep trying new ideas – our program has evolved a lot over the last few years – and to keep acknowledging the students’ participation. I keep track of how much we have saved from the landfill and we just celebrated our 2-year anniversary and, in that time, we saved about 800 pounds from the landfill – an amount that can fill our school office from the floor to the ceiling!

    If you have questions about starting a similar system in your school, or about general sustainability in Vancouver schools, please contact the VSB’s Sustainability Office at .If you have questions about starting a similar system in your school, or about general sustainability in Vancouver schools, please contact the VSB’s Sustainability Office at sustainability@vsb.bc.ca.
  • 12 Jul 2018 4:55 PM | Anonymous


    Members' Corner is a new, monthly blog series where SPEC members share our favourite sustainability-related resources.


    You should watch: Merchants of DoubtMerchants of Doubt

    Amarita Pooni, Westside Community Food Market Coordinator

    A documentary that looks at pundits-for-hire who present themselves as scientific authorities as they speak about topics like toxic chemicals, pharmaceuticals and climate change. It is really interesting how it correlates the actions of creating doubt in the tobacco industry with that of climate change. While it does discuss other topics as well it bring to light the tactics used to prevent legislation moving forwards against climate change. Discusses the impact climate change has on local community.

    Watch here.


    You should read: The known unknowns of plastic

     pollution, by The Economist

    Carol Cohen, SPEC volunteer & Master Recycler grad

    This article is about some (perhaps less known) facts about plastic pollution and the ways that it is not as bad as other kinds of pollution, without minimizing the problems with plastic. I like the article because it presented some new information to me and some perspectives that gave me new food for thought about this topic.


    You should watch: DamNation

    Robin Hadac, SPEC Communications and Volunteer Coordinator

    For anyone interested in waterways, fisheries, and the history of dams in the United States, you should watch the short documentary DamNation, by Travis Rummel and Ben Knight. Largely focused on Washington state, the filmmakers look at a number of case studies where the installation of dams decimated local fish runs and flooded key ecological habitats. The film also shows how quickly local fish runs are revitalized when dams are removed. The documentary unfortunately does not touch on BC dams nor the environmental impact that the Site C dam will have on the Peace River, but it is easy to see how BC could learn from the repeal of the dam-craze in the United States.


    You should watch: Before the Flood, by Fisher

     Stevens

    Magali Vander Vorst, SPEC Board member

    First of, it has Leonardo DiCaprio, so that’s a powerful reason right there. 

    If that’s not enough – for some strange reason – then you should watch it because it gives a clear view of day-to-day things that we do that can make a difference at a global scale if only we made the smallest effort to change them. From incinerated rainforests in Indonesia to eating habits in the US, the film tackles a variety of issues and gives well-researched numbers to help you realize the magnitude of many underestimated problems. The documentary is not only depicting a dim future, is also giving you the tools to change that fate.

  • 03 Jul 2018 4:51 PM | Anonymous

    We recently posted a blog post by SPEC’s President, Dr. Carole Christopher, on creating dialogue and building solidarity across differences. While the post mentions the Kinder Morgan Pipeline issue that seems to be at the forefront of everyone’s minds these days, the arguments raised in the blog post are just as relevant for the fight against Site C.

    Therefore, we want to share some things you can do in order to stay informed about the current Site C situation and get more involved:

    1. Pledge to follow the court case that the West Moberly and Prophet River First Nations have launched - they are going to court on July 23 to seek an injunction on the dam: https://witnessforthepeace.ca/

    2. Join a crew of people up north to the Paddle for the Peace, which is happening on July 14: https://paddleforthepeace.ca/

    3. Read these two new books that have come out: Damming the Peace, edited by Wendy Holm and Breaching the Peace, by Sarah Cox.

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   Next >  Last >> 
Copyright © 2017 Society Promoting Environmental Conservation


Canadian charitable registration number:  118836311 RR0001


Society Promoting Environmental Conservation

2305 West 7th Ave 

Vancouver, BC  V6K 1Y4

T: 604.736.7732
E:  admin(at)spec(dot)bc(dot)ca


Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software